So in your head, people are rich because they throw away their money?
Nothing says “cheap” more than clothes which are pretending to be expensive. If you’re going to dress up, wear your better clothes that are in your normal style.
Personally I wouldn’t bother. Just wear what you normally wear. Not everyone is interested in clothes even if they have money.
Bad Britain has 4 countries thank you very much.
Shrinkflation is smaller quantities
Yes
and/or higher prices.
No. That’s just normal inflation.
Even if you decide to compromise, it’s worth doing so knowing that you are. It also looks good to the employer if you’re taking a real interest in the position and sizing it up.
Everything here, but I’d like to build a little on this.
Remember that you are also interviewing the company. You need to make a decision about whether this is a place you want to work. Will it give you the opportunity to learn when you need to learn? Are they a team that treat each other well? Do they have good dynamics? Can you see yourself benefiting from working here beyond just taking a pay check?
Those that worked worked more by luck than by design though. That’s what I’m trying to say. Different dimmer, and you’ll probably get different ones working.
No LED bulbs will work properly with triac based dimmers. “Dimmable LEDs” are horrible hacks that just about cling on for dear life, and many just won’t work at all. Those dimmers are for incandescent bulbs.
The right way to dim an LED is pulse width modulation of the DC power, not chopping up the AC wave. That’s what smart bulbs do because they have the dimming logic after the power supply is convertered from AC to DC in the bulb enclosure.
You know the study of history isnt just taking one account and believing it, right?
You build as much evidence as you can from multiple sources so you can account for and remove those biases. Obviously, the further back you go, the harder it is to find evidence but that doesn’t mean you work from one source.
The slave system would be senseless, stupid and unnatural under modern conditions. But under the conditions of a disintegrating primitive communal system, the slave system is a quite understandable
What bullcrap! Slavery exists today. It’s still repugnant even though it “makes sense” to those that benefit from it.
The Mongols rampaging across Asia and offering the false choice of slavery or anhilation to all the people they encountered was evil then and it’s evil today. Distancing yourself from it doesn’t change the evaluation.
Hexbear and Lemmit.
Got bored of arguing with fanatical communists and I have no interest in mirrored content from Reddit.
…because that’s his name. It was how people referred to him. It’s not like people are going “He’s Grrrreat!” like Tony the Tiger.
Is this just a case of “great” having changed meaning subtly? Now it’s a superlative more than anything else, but in this usage I feel it meaning is much more about scale of what they did. Not a judgment on the morality of what they did.
Probably more people are descendents of Ghengis Khan than aren’t. Certainly nothing special.
Do we glorify them, or do we just learn about them because they had a huge impact on the world?
I don’t think I’ve ever heard of anyone holding Genghis Khan up as a role model.
I’ve never seen one.
17,000 employees is ridiculous in itself. It’s at least an order of magnitude too high.
And I assume all the shareholders were fine with this?
…and as time marches on?
Somebody saying “I am a mermaid” would be looked at strangely too.