Yes, because more people with positive things to say about stuff like money and fame influenced the inputs.
I like to discuss tech, but also politics and religion. I hope that I can teach people some things I think I know.
The name’s Theo Mulraney of England, and I am trying to “transcend” current Humanity by “banging on about computers” (and “aliens”) that “encode certain types of abstract data”.
Yes, because more people with positive things to say about stuff like money and fame influenced the inputs.
You want me to tell you some jokes? Ok!
Why did the duck cross the road? Because he went quack!
Jokes are often about word associations and patterns.
Again, you completely made up that number.
I think you should look up statistical probability tests for the means of normal distributions, at least if you want a stronger argument.
Yes, but this is also its own special kind of logic. It’s a statistical distribution.
You can define whatever statistical distribution you want and do whatever calculations you want with it.
The computer can take your inputs, do a bunch of stats calculations internally, then return a bunch of related outputs.
What part do you want me to repeat or explain differently?
The choices you make have to be based on some kind of logic and inputs with corresponding outputs though, especially on a computer.
Yes. Because so many people seem to have changed their belief systems.
Naturalism is essentially based on the strict adherence to Newton’s laws, which were shown to be slightly wrong in some cases.
I think it can be, if you know how to use it
It’s part of the answer. You can do computer/logic programming on an imaginary Orb as well, like in Lisp.
In physics and advanced mathematical geometry, an Orb can store vast amounts of energy and mathematical information based on sets. Stars and black holes are examples of physical orbs you can ponder.
I have my own informationally dense belief system that stores logic, so yes, I suppose