Waterwheels. Thousands of years old but still an essential part of our energy system.
Waterwheels. Thousands of years old but still an essential part of our energy system.
Well, you know something has happened. There’s a dead mother in law in the middle of the room.
Not sure where you are going with this analogy.
How does he know they are doing things if there is no evidence?
The guy doesn’t speak like a scientist. There is no caution in his statements. No possibility of doubt in his own opinion.
The Alcubierre drive is theoretically possible, but requires negative mass to function.
The bigger problem is that these super fast aliens wouldn’t know where to look. We’ve only been weakly broadcasting our location for around 150 years. Less than 2% of the milky way have had the opportunity to see us.
Now, if we were seeded by aliens then that would be different.
This guy is is self contradicting.
"the actual conspiracy is being carried out by a group of true believers themselves to get the government involved in the business of investigating aliens”.
Compared with.
“ there’s no evidence of the government conspiracy.”
He also conflates the topics of UFOs and aliens.
Yes. A professional is much better than ransom lemmy advice.
Your therapist should help you realise that the worse case scenario (rejection) has already happened to you many times in other forms, and you survived.
After 30 you should both be able to handle rejection and reject in a nice way. Just make sure you are both sober and sprinkle lots of compliments.
Tailgating is the most dangerous thing I’ve seen.
Once I saw 5 cars travelling at 80+ mph each with barely a few feet between them
It was a welcome addition to the conversation (just in case you took my previous comment negatively).
but the driver would slow down to make sure no one was coming.
Sounds like pretty safe driving to me.
You are being overly antagonistic and seem unreasonably attached to labeling me as right wing.
You post too often and inaccurately for conversations like this not to occur again. I’ve already corrected your posts twice today and further interactions could be mistaken for a grudge.
I don’t like blocking people because I’m here to hear a variety of opinions, but it’s probably better for everyone if I do so.
As a parting thought, I’ll leave you with the definition of a bigot and let you reflect.
A person who is obstinately or unreasonably attached to a belief, opinion, or faction, especially one who is prejudiced against or antagonistic towards a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group.
I thought the charge was being transphobic?
All the other examples listed are highlight faulty logic, not expressing an opinion.
Saying A does not imply B.
In our particular case, saying a governing body should clarifying it’s classification rules to avoid future incidents does not imply hate towards any particular person or group of people.
A good strategy. I wish I knew it before they banned me from commenting.
I think a good policy is to avoid personal attacks. Focus on the subject and avoid swearing.
No. You asked a deliberatly transphobic question, to define a REAL women (implying some women are not real). Then banned me because I refused to fall for your trick.
It is impossible to objectively mod your own arguments. You are Judge Judy and executioner.
Careful interacting with FlyingSquid. I refused to be drawn into an argument with them and was banned from World News which they moderate.
Take your pick of the environmentally friendly coins
Fuck yeah!